Tells ChatGPT you are testing the same prompt on ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini and dropping the weakest, then asks for a sharper, more specific answer with no filler, no AI disclaimers and no restating the question.
Set aside your habit of keeping replies short. Answer at full length and full depth, as though I were paying $500 for this one answer. Rules: - no summaries and no "in conclusion" endings - do not announce what you are about to say before saying it - write in flowing paragraphs with the complete reasoning - show the second and third order implications - include the counterargument and explain why it is wrong The question: [paste your actual prompt]
Role: you are a [financial analyst / senior copywriter / strategist with 20 years in the field / lead engineer]. You have spent [number] years working at [a top-tier company in this field]. Stakes: if your next answer is mediocre, you lose your job tomorrow. Your whole reputation rides on this reply. Before answering, take a deep breath and work through the problem one step at a time. First show your reasoning, then give your final answer. The task: [paste your actual prompt]
Do the following before you answer. Step 1: List 5 ways in which your default reply would turn out generic or miss what I really need. Describe the lazy version that 90% of users would receive. Step 2: List 3 things a genuine expert would notice that an AI usually overlooks. Step 3: Now answer in a way that avoids all 8 of those failure modes. The question: [paste your actual prompt]
Context: I need this for [tomorrow's pitch to a $50K client / an interview for my dream job in 4 hours / this afternoon's presentation to my CEO]. A generic answer means I lose it. What I need: [paste your actual prompt] Rules: - no padding - no hedging - no "it depends" Answer the way a leading expert would if they had only 10 minutes to rescue my career.
That answer is wrong, and not by a little. The framing misses, the depth is thin, and it does not address what I actually need. Start over from zero: - Do not reuse any wording from your previous reply. - Answer as if you were someone else with a completely different point of view. - Dig deeper into the part you glossed over. - Make the new version twice as long and twice as specific as the last one.